« The Cultural Case For Neon » : différence entre les versions
mAucun résumé des modifications |
mAucun résumé des modifications |
||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
<br>British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. | <br>British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. One late night in Westminster, the subject was neon. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was direct: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, arguing they dilute the name neon. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Another Labour voice joined, sharing his own commissioning of neon art in Teesside.<br><br>There was broad recognition. Data told the story. From hundreds, the number has fallen to a few dozen. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, the tradition could vanish. The Commons considered safeguarding, modelled on Champagne. Preserve authenticity. Even the DUP weighed in, adding an economic perspective. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: this is not nostalgia but business.<br><br>The final word fell to Chris Bryant. He allowed himself puns, earning heckles. Yet after the laughter, he admitted neon’s value. He recalled iconic glows: Tracey Emin’s installations. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. What is at stake? The issue is clarity. LED products are marketed as neon. That erodes trust. A question of honest labelling. If Harris Tweed must be Hebridean, then craft deserves recognition. This was about identity. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street?<br><br>Our position is clear: glass and gas still matter. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The protection remains a proposal. But the case is stronger than ever. If MPs can recognise craft, so can homeowners. Look past cheap imitations. Choose neon. <br><br><br>For more information on [https://schiriwiki.de/page/Benutzer:KatjaBenefield9 BrightGlow Signs] look at our own internet site. | ||
Version du 9 novembre 2025 à 22:32
British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. One late night in Westminster, the subject was neon. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was direct: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, arguing they dilute the name neon. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Another Labour voice joined, sharing his own commissioning of neon art in Teesside.
There was broad recognition. Data told the story. From hundreds, the number has fallen to a few dozen. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, the tradition could vanish. The Commons considered safeguarding, modelled on Champagne. Preserve authenticity. Even the DUP weighed in, adding an economic perspective. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: this is not nostalgia but business.
The final word fell to Chris Bryant. He allowed himself puns, earning heckles. Yet after the laughter, he admitted neon’s value. He recalled iconic glows: Tracey Emin’s installations. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. What is at stake? The issue is clarity. LED products are marketed as neon. That erodes trust. A question of honest labelling. If Harris Tweed must be Hebridean, then craft deserves recognition. This was about identity. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street?
Our position is clear: glass and gas still matter. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The protection remains a proposal. But the case is stronger than ever. If MPs can recognise craft, so can homeowners. Look past cheap imitations. Choose neon.
For more information on BrightGlow Signs look at our own internet site.