Aller au contenu

MPs Argue Over Real Neon Vs Fake Plastic

De Wikilibre
Version datée du 10 novembre 2025 à 17:28 par Dick06A1298376 (discussion | contributions)
(diff) ← Version précédente | Version actuelle (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)


Parliament isn’t usually fun. Budgets, neon lights store policy jargon, same old speeches. Yet last spring, the place actually glowed — because they lit up over glowing tubes. Yasmin Qureshi, Labour MP lit the place up defending real neon. She tore into LED wannabes. Her line? If it’s not bent glass filled with neon gas, it ain’t neon. Clear argument. Neon is an art form, not some strip light fad. Chris McDonald piled in who bragged about neon art in Teesside.

The benches buzzed. Then came the killer numbers: from hundreds, only a handful remain. No new blood. Without protection, the craft dies. She called for law like Harris Tweed or Champagne. Save the skill. Out of nowhere, best neon lights DUP’s Jim Shannon chimed in. He talked money. Big bucks in glow. His point: neon is a future industry. Closing the circus was Chris Bryant. He couldn’t resist wordplay. He got roasted for dad jokes.

But underneath the banter, the case was strong. He nodded to cultural landmarks: Walthamstow Stadium. He said glass and gas beat plastic. Why all this noise? Simple: fake LED "neon" floods every online shop. Heritage vanishes. Think Scotch whisky. If labels matter, neon deserves the same. This was bigger than signage. Do we want every high street glowing with plastic sameness? We’ll keep it blunt: real neon rules. MPs argued over signs. Nothing signed, the case is made.

If it belongs in Parliament, it belongs in your bar. Dump the LEDs. Back the craft.


For those who have any issues with regards to in which and tips on how to make use of Signs & Lights Studio, it is possible to contact us at our own site.