Why Parliament Debated The Glow

The Commons is rarely a forum for craft. Budgets, healthcare, international relations. On a spring evening this year, the subject was neon. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, best neon lights brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was clear: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She warned against plastic imitations, saying they undermine public trust. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Chris McDonald, MP for neon lights for sale Stockton North, speaking of local artists.

There was broad recognition. Numbers framed the urgency. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. No apprentices follow. Without action, the tradition could vanish. Qureshi proposed legal recognition, similar to Harris Tweed. Preserve authenticity. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose, bringing a commercial lens. Forecasts predict $3.3bn market by 2031. His point: authentic craft has future potential. Chris Bryant concluded the session.

He played with glow metaphors, lightening the mood. Yet beyond the humour, he recognised the seriousness. He cited neon’s cultural impact: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. What is at stake? The answer is authenticity. Consumers are misled. That erodes trust. It is no different to whisky or Champagne. If Champagne must be French, then craft deserves recognition. This was about identity.

Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street? We hold no doubt: authentic glow endures. The Commons was illuminated. The Act is still to come. But the case is stronger than ever. If Westminster can defend glow, so can we all. Look past cheap imitations. Support artisans.


If you enjoyed this short article and you would like to get more facts relating to lighting that draws attention kindly browse through our web page.