Grammaticality Is The Set Phrase "for Free" Correct European Country Nomenclature Custom Hatful Exchange

Sight Substitution mesh consists of 183 Q&A communities including Push-down stack Overflow, the largest, to the highest degree trusted online profession for developers to learn, deal their knowledge, and build their careers. The select of prepositions depends upon the temporal context of use in which you're speaking. "On ~ afternoon" implies that the good afternoon is a one distributor point in time; thus, that worldly circumstance would carry the intact good afternoon as unrivaled of several dissimilar afternoons, or in former words, single would employment "on" when oral presentation inside the linguistic context of an intact workweek.
Employers' advertizement is nowadays beingness subsidised by the taxpayers, rather a few of whom are, of course, functional the great unwashed. In some of this advertising, propaganda is made for "free enterprise" as narrowly and intolerably formed by the Status Affiliation of Manufacturers. Somewhat oftentimes these subsidized advertisements bam project. It would be big plenty if diligence were spending its have money to effort to set up inauthentic ideas in the populace mind, merely when diligence is permitted to do it "for free," someone in a high place ought to stand up and holler. In recent decades, however, use of "for free" to mean "at no cost" has skyrocketed. Search results for the period 2001–2008 alone yield hundreds of matches in all sorts of edited publications, including books from university presses.
"In ~ afternoon" suggests that the afternoon is a temporal space in-and-of-itself, wherein anything that happens will happen amongst many other events. In other words, the temporal context for this usage would be if one were speaking of a single day -- whether past, present, or future -- and of a single afternoon, during which many things might happen. I'm sorry that I haven't given you one particular word as you requested but I have given some examples by which you can effectively (and nicely) state that something is not free of charge without having to use a statement like 'The product is not free of charge'. There is nothing wrong with changing your choice of words slightly to convey the same sentiment. If we become too fixated on using a particular phrase it can detract from what we finally say. So rather than searching to find a perfect antonym, make use of all the other beautiful words we have which will get your point across. The use of "myself" and similar reflexives for emphasis is normal English usage of the word. This particular speaker wanted to place emphasis on the fact that they personally were one of the people you could contact for information. As the above commentator suggests, one can never say "in the Sat afternoon" -- but i think you already know that.
An example sentence would be really useful to show what you want the opposite of. Any word that can be used and interpreted in so many ways as free needs contextual background if we are to understand what you're asking for. However, the original example (a naked myself used as an emphatic me) is considered by many (and I personally agree) to be poor style. And many people may (wrongly, IMO) consider it incorrect. So I'd generally suggest avoiding it unless you really do need the emphasis for some reason. And even then, you can get emphasis by using "me personally" or "me myself", which is much less unpleasant. Big-time performers, or the movie studios to which they are under contract, donate their services.
"She named me yesterday afternoon, and aforementioned her mornings are too meddlesome to utter. She's stillness not indisputable what her plans are for Sunday, so she'll solitary be able to yield me her resolve on Sat good afternoon." Although the earliest match for "for free" in my original answer was from the August 16, 1947 issue of The Billboard magazine, I have subsequently run more-extensive searches in Google Books and Hathi Trust and turned up multiple matches from as early as February 1943. Here is a rundown of the matches I found from 1943 and 1944. Reasonable paraphrasings of the word free in this context are for nothing/for no payment. Clearly the word "for" can't be omitted from those paraphrasings. Thus many people will say that for free equates to for for free, so they feel it's ungrammatical. Finally, my answer is based not only on the reference I cited but also on my 28 years of experience as a copy editor (and a reader of books on usage) and on my 45+ years as a close reader of literature and nonfiction.
The phrase "give up of charge" (blue line) has always been vastly more common than "discharge from charge" (red line), as this Ngram graph shows. But I want to point out a couple of things that surprised me when I looked into possible differences between "gratuitous of" and "unfreeze from." They are not exactly interchangeable, but the distinction is very subtle.
If times get a little better in the future additional benefits will be added—again for free. Thinking that he was an old wanderer from his gray beard, they dined him and as Lem didn't tip his duke they gave him a buck and TRANSEXUAL PORN SEX VIDEOS two years subscription for the Hog Cholera Monthly for free. Before our hero could locate a hotel he was surrounded by a group of natives, who greeted him royally, offering him free room and board (pitch-'til-you-win style). Suddenly a group of local business men kidnaped him from the crowd and rushed him to the best hotel in town where he was given for free a suite of rooms. After being wined and dined Lem was rushed to the burg's best club where he learned what it was all about. For free is an informal phrase used to mean "without monetary value or defrayal." Many people use the expression (at least informally), so it seems futile to take issue with it - though more "careful" advertising copywriters do still tend to avoid it. Being at home sick I haven’t the energy to absorb all the differences between agency or instrumentality, as in death from starvation, and cause, motive, occasion or reason, as in dying of hunger, to say nothing about the death of 1,000 cuts. If (as the sentence implies) the dictator had once ruled them but now no longer did.
To illustrate, let me first change your example sentences into the forms I find most agreeable.
But since free-loading means exactly the same thing as free-riding, they could (and some do) also speak of the "free-docker problem" though this is less common. From (at least) Olson (1965), it has been common for economists to speak of the "free-passenger problem". In the labor leader's book of foul names the free rider is all kinds of a slacker, slob, and heel—the lowest type of cheapskate and the most vicious type of ingrate—an individual unworthy to ride on the bandwagon of unionism beside those who have paid their fare.
Especially are we anxious to go to the ports of embarkation, where those boys go in and do not come out until they get on the transport. They are given the best that the theater has to offer, and they get it "for costless." Because free by itself can function as an adverb in the sense "at no cost," some critics reject the phrase for free. A phrase such as for nothing, at no cost, or a similar substitute will often work better. The phrase is correct; you should not use it where you are supposed to only use a formal sentence, but that doesn't make a phrase not correct.