« Parliament’s Neon Debate Shines » : différence entre les versions
mAucun résumé des modifications |
mAucun résumé des modifications |
||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
<br>It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the | <br>It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, not MPs waxing lyrical about glowing tubes of gas. But on a unexpected Commons session, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi stood tall to back neon craftsmen. Her argument was simple: authentic neon is heritage, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market. She hammered the point: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.<br><br>Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North telling MPs about neon art in Teesside. Even the sceptics were glowing. The numbers hit home. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in the UK. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. Even DUP MP Jim Shannon weighed in. He highlighted forecasts, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. Translation: heritage can earn money.<br><br>Bryant had the final say. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, earning heckles and laughter. But beneath the jokes was recognition. He reminded MPs of Britain’s glow: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He argued glass and gas beat plastic strips. So why the debate? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That kills the craft. Think Scotch whisky. If tweed is legally defined, why not neon?. The glow was cultural, not procedural.<br><br>Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? At Smithers, we’re clear: plastic impostors don’t cut it. Parliament had its glow-up. It’s still early days, but the case has been made. If it belongs in the Commons, it belongs in your home. Skip the fakes. Bring the authentic glow. <br><br><br>If you beloved this article and you simply would like to be given more info pertaining to [http://xn--23-np4iz15g.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=1039850 NeonCrafts Studio] i implore you to visit the web-page. | ||
Dernière version du 11 novembre 2025 à 03:00
It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, not MPs waxing lyrical about glowing tubes of gas. But on a unexpected Commons session, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi stood tall to back neon craftsmen. Her argument was simple: authentic neon is heritage, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market. She hammered the point: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.
Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North telling MPs about neon art in Teesside. Even the sceptics were glowing. The numbers hit home. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in the UK. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. Even DUP MP Jim Shannon weighed in. He highlighted forecasts, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. Translation: heritage can earn money.
Bryant had the final say. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, earning heckles and laughter. But beneath the jokes was recognition. He reminded MPs of Britain’s glow: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He argued glass and gas beat plastic strips. So why the debate? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That kills the craft. Think Scotch whisky. If tweed is legally defined, why not neon?. The glow was cultural, not procedural.
Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? At Smithers, we’re clear: plastic impostors don’t cut it. Parliament had its glow-up. It’s still early days, but the case has been made. If it belongs in the Commons, it belongs in your home. Skip the fakes. Bring the authentic glow.
If you beloved this article and you simply would like to be given more info pertaining to NeonCrafts Studio i implore you to visit the web-page.