Modification de Why Parliament Debated The Glow

<br>The Commons is rarely a forum for craft. Budgets, healthcare, international relations. Yet in May 2025, MPs were talking about light. Yasmin Qureshi, Labour MP for Bolton South and Walkden, brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was uncompromising: real neon is both craft and culture. She contrasted it with cheap LED substitutes, noting they erase tradition. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, positioning neon as regional creativity.<br><br>Cross-party nodding followed. Data told the story. From hundreds,  buy neon lights the number has fallen to a few dozen. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, the tradition could vanish. Qureshi proposed legal recognition, like Cornish pasties. Protect the name. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: authentic craft has future potential. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He played with glow metaphors, earning heckles.<br><br>Yet beneath the levity, he admitted neon’s value. He listed Britain’s neon landmarks: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He suggested neon is unfairly judged on eco terms. Why the debate? The risk is confusion. LED products are marketed as neon. That diminishes value. A question of honest labelling. If Champagne must be French, then craft deserves recognition. The debate mattered beyond signage. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street?<br><br>We hold no doubt: real neon matters. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The protection remains a proposal. But the campaign is alive. If Westminster can defend glow, so can we all. Skip LED pretenders. Choose neon. <br><br><br>If you cherished this article so you would like to acquire more info regarding [https://45.76.249.136/index.php?title=User:FranchescaBodnar LumoLite Custom Neon] please visit the web site.