A Historical Debate On Neon Signs And Road Safety

It’s not often that one comes across a debate of such interest, but I recently had the pleasure of revisiting a particularly fascinating discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The topic? The growing issue of electric neon signs—specifically those brightly colored signs outside shops and factories situated near major roadways. At the time, these signs were creating a considerable amount of confusion for drivers. Why? Because they were so strikingly similar to the automatic traffic signals that drivers relied upon to guide them.

This led to a heated exchange, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, pointed out the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local authorities had the right to demand the removal of any sign or object that could be confused with a traffic light. In theory, this would help clear up any confusion caused by neon signs in close proximity busy roads.

However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as simple as it seemed. In the House, Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who, may I ask, is the judge of what is or isn’t confusing? he inquired. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the highway authority's decision to make that determination. This raised the question of whether there would be uniformity—would there be uniformity in how different areas of the country handled this issue?

Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had had enough data on this particular issue. After all, with the rise of electric signs, surely the Ministry should have data and a policy in place to handle the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, reiterated that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He insisted that it was for local authorities to take the appropriate action, and that his superior was already considering it.

Yet, Mr. Jones raised another question: should not the Minister of Transport take a more active role in ensuring consistency? This is where the debate really became interesting—should it be left to local authorities to tackle it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a consistent, national solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson acknowledged that the matter was indeed causing confusion, though he deferred to the Ministry’s internal discussions for a more clear response.

He suggested that the situation would be closely monitored, but as yet, no firm action had been taken. What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a seemingly small issue—neon signs—could spark such a substantial discussion in Parliament.

In case you loved this information as well as you wish to get more information concerning BrightGlow Signs generously go to our web-page.